Image Details


QueenOfMonsters.jpg

Grif 9/21/2014 9:38:33 PM Rating: 8

........*pukes in mouth*
fart 9/21/2014 9:52:12 PM Rating: 6

Next she will eat the moon...hell...she already has...
PirateYoga 9/22/2014 3:23:56 PM Rating: 8

Seriously, it's just messed up that we have "Hide Male" and "Hide Furry" button, but not a "Hide BBW" button... I mean, the majority of furry pics I've seen don't deserve to be hidden- but these pics aren't? Where's the logic in that?
mrninja 9/22/2014 3:51:41 PM Rating: 2

I thought you had to be 18+ to be on this site? This is a site for adults, start acting like it. Giantessbooru was meant for giant/giantess fans of many kinds. If you don't like the image then don't click the thumbnail, or comment on the image. Is it that complicated?
mrninja 9/22/2014 4:23:04 PM Rating: 0

Different view points are fine, it's when people type commets insulting someone else's fetish and refuse to accept the fact that there are many different kinds of giantesses. That's what I find immature.

As for the filters, well there are 96 bbw images versus 2,523 furry images and 1,264 giant images. There aren't nearly as many bbw images as the others. There aren't nearly as common, so yes, people can tough it out.
mrninja 9/22/2014 4:24:47 PM Rating: 0

Sorry, Didn't see your comment, MarkM. Ill lay off, just hate seeing hateful comments.
Sobek_Nilegod 9/22/2014 4:34:55 PM Rating: 0

Sheesh, whomever made this image SURELY MUST hate Godzilla. -_-
GoddessViolet 9/23/2014 5:24:25 AM Rating: 2

I feel like the proper thing to do is to strip out the "male" and "furry" filters entirely, and replace them with a system that lets each individual user filter based on specific tags. Voila. Problem solved for everybody. Yeah, it's a bit more effort to code, but I feel like, since the content filter already exists, extending the framework to accept a list instead of a boolean as an argument shouldn't be a massive undertaking.
Bbaass 9/24/2014 2:26:22 PM Rating: 2

A system like that has been mentioned several times before, but afaik, nothing more than talking about has been done.

A tag blacklist that a user can specify in his/her profile page can replace the current set of filters, which would mean images no longer need to be given "hidden" tags, they would just need 1 set of tags.

And while we're of the subject of possible improvement to GB, I came up with an idea to allow users to edit tags again, but still prevent bot accounts messing things up:
Once a user has been a member for x amount of time, and they have uploaded x amount of images that have been approved, they can be given the required permissions automatically.