Image Details


63242f9010c1c57238d59fd6b7d9d591.png

Flying_Waffle 2/20/2020 8:33:01 AM Rating: 2

Real talk, is Gardevoir considered furry seeing as it's a humanoid with no fur and could basically pass as a human with weird skin and hair color

:thinking:
Zephyr 2/20/2020 10:01:25 AM Rating: 4

"Gardevoir, go back into the pokeball!!"

- "No, your pokeballs gonna go into me^^"
GTSLover72 2/20/2020 8:29:43 PM Rating: 0

Technically humans are "furries" too. Since fur and hair are pretty much the same thing, and some humans are absolutely covered in hair.

Then again, that's probably not the point you were going for...
PseudoNymzz 2/21/2020 4:05:03 AM Rating: 2

I would not consider Gardevoir furry. Furries are anthropomorphic non-human animals, and Gardevoir is not recognizably a take on a non-human animal.

Spongebob has a better case for being a furry, in my opinion.
Pretty_Cat_Princess 2/21/2020 5:16:32 AM Rating: 2

Mrr... Methinks that, in terms of classification Gardevoir falls under furry, purely because she's a planet native non human creature, at least for the classification for the furry filter

For a more direct classification, nya thinks we gonna have to do an animal tree and say she falls under the higher general "Furry" tag for being a non human animal, but her specific tree is gardevoir. That's nya classification, mew