Sightengine has a high reliability percentage unless a very simple kind of filter is added, in which case it is useless. The thing that gives this away as AI is the fact that the giantess is looking in the wrong direction, not at the tiny, which is one of the most common mistakes that some AI artists doesn't bother to fix when making their images. People wouldn't understand if they haven't spent a lot of time with AI production.
Anyway, ItDoesntHurt, you have been misinderformed. There are no setbacks to AI when it is done properly, unless you hate high quality, high realism, interactions that actually work. If you prefer more anime-ish art that, quite often, looks like it has been drawn by a kid, then fair enough. But to use the word "slop" about AI art is just a sign of people feeling threatened that their drawing skills are doomed to go extinct when enough people embrace the future instead of fearing it. Notice how the word "AI slop" is casually thrown around, primarily by your various accounts in here, yet there are never any actual arguments against AI art. Just "it's AI slop, I don't like it".
Instead of hating on the future, you should just embrace it. Embrace the realism, embrace the quality. Art in this genre has never been better than AI has allowed it to be now.
|
