Why isn't there an AI-art tag on this one? I know filters have been applied to it that cover it's Ai origins from AI checking systems, that's easy to do if one intends to hide that they're doing AI art. I could make the AI aspects of my own art undetectable to such systems if I wanted to, I have tested it, works every time. But this image carries literally ALL of the common signs of AI art.
1) The giantess is starring in a random direction.
2) The little guy is misshapen, with obvious AI fingers and arms.
3) The texture on the giantess' legs are completely different than the texture on the rest of her body.
4) She's doing typical random AI stuff with her fingers, implying that the user probably prompted for her to hold a tiny between her fingers and looking at him, but the AI machine placed the tiny guy somewhere else than intended.
5) Random AI lights/watermarks etc. all over. There is even some random grey stuff behind her back that certainly isn't meant to be her hair, due to the way it twists and that it also has a different color than her actual hair.
I'm NOT trying to diss the artist here. I have seen far worse AI art than this. I just think we should all be honest about out work. Any person of average intelligence can tell that this is AI if they have spent any amount of time working with it, and I don't understand why the artist filters it to conceal it. I mean, I know why, he does it because there are quite a lot of AI haters out there, but no one should hide from those, they merely need to accept the future. We can't teach them how great AI is if we hide the fact that we're doing AI.
|
