Really what it comes down to for both poser and collages is if the work looks dated, as in not up with today's abilities, it's likely not going make the cut. It's the same process for everyone regardless of their status here. I think really what we look for in concerning 3D images, is if the image has been produced as an art piece by itself. That means it's not part of a massive set where the artist barely clicked and dragged the image to make it "different" from the last image. Drawing sets are not even done this way, they're advanced scenes to quickly progress the story, a million images with barely minor changes does not make an interesting story, and we won't add a billion frame story to the site.
Out of those sets however we will find exceptional images and be more than happy to add these into the collective as individual art pieces because the scene looks good all on it's own.
As it is with 3D guidelines, free or cheap programs probably would take quite the exceptionally gifted artist to produce images in the clarity we like to see.
We don't pick on 3D artists, they are just unfortunately the larger part of the pie in the screening process, however collages are nearly as tightly screened as 3D works for what we are looking for. A lot of images from the old archive had made it through screening in the mad rush to get the site online, and I think that creates a lot of confusion as to what we are looking for in this site being something like a giantess image museum rather than a place to dump any and all giantess'ish related images.
Slowly we are moving through the image database and refining the images from the old archive that doesn't quite meet the standards we are seeking, hopefully you will be able to tell the difference in overall quality within the database as time progresses.
|