User Comments tuxedo_cat

tuxedo_cat 8/9/2015 12:33:56 AM Rating: 2

Normally, I don't care for extended stomachs. But this one came with a bee pun; so its turn-on quality is instantly raised to 10/10. Seriously though, the first half of this is great. I'll even give the bottom half the credit for creativity, using a honey-goo girl. I really enjoy the inside view though. It's very bright and colorful; and it's giving me an enormous craving for wild flower honey and sweet jams!
View Details
tuxedo_cat 8/2/2015 6:31:04 PM Rating: 0

Don't worry, iswear12. I thought it was the hymen.
View Details
tuxedo_cat 7/23/2015 2:41:01 PM Rating: 0

So has Sheela just been really booking it with the works lately? Or has it just been a long time of stockpiling since anyone uploaded some her stuff?
View Details
tuxedo_cat 7/15/2015 3:28:30 AM Rating: 0

Anyone else notice how the tongue is pretty decent quality, yet the rest, as you go further out, looks more like it was done in Microsoft Paint? Makes me wonder why they even bothered to include a beach background.
View Details
tuxedo_cat 7/15/2015 3:25:05 AM Rating: 0

[insert "my dick's so big, when I turn left, I play baseball with the moon" joke here]
View Details
tuxedo_cat 7/14/2015 10:12:34 AM Rating: 0

I know that "Attack of the 50ft Woman" was a movie from the black-and-white days of cinema. And seeing how the poster for it is commonly known enough (by the public; not just the gts community), it's likely that the movie was popular enough to warrant a sequel.
View Details
tuxedo_cat 7/9/2015 2:10:58 AM Rating: 0

I guess it's the Attack of the 50-Foot Bunny Boy.
View Details
tuxedo_cat 7/2/2015 7:47:10 AM Rating: 0

Actually, L_J, it was a quote from a YouTube show called Cinema Sins. They always make that joke when people are running away from something that could very easily be avoided if you just ran left or right.
View Details
tuxedo_cat 7/2/2015 7:33:51 AM Rating: 2

Based on the time period, I'd probably question her ability to hold any sort of social or political status, as well as her ability to bring about the next generation to inherit my throne.
View Details
tuxedo_cat 6/30/2015 11:40:42 AM Rating: 2

This guy graduated from the Promethius school of running away from things.
View Details
tuxedo_cat 6/28/2015 8:18:33 AM Rating: 2

Technically, the artist was the first one to look at this in total. ...or if you believe in an omniscient deity that knows the future, than that god saw it first.
View Details
tuxedo_cat 6/27/2015 11:38:52 PM Rating: 0

Imagine watching porn in person; and you known one or both of the participants. There's also the idea of seeing your spouse being adulterous and unfaithful, intentionally. It kind of sounds like bdsm meets a 3-some. And the punishment is that you can't join.
View Details
tuxedo_cat 6/27/2015 12:10:30 AM Rating: 2

You know if you have multiple things to say, you can just hold shift and hit enter twice. Then you'll have a second line like this one, rather than multiple, separate comments.
View Details
tuxedo_cat 6/23/2015 12:38:47 AM Rating: 0

Why is a miniaturized Captain Quark stuck to her thigh? I thought he always hated leg day.
View Details
tuxedo_cat 6/15/2015 8:14:07 AM Rating: 4

The artist is mukatkikaarn.
View Details
tuxedo_cat 6/13/2015 9:39:36 PM Rating: 0

Well I mean if you look at the horizon, you can clearly see it's all skies. And with nothing but a layer of clouds on the bottom, at only her waist height, you can assume it's giantess content. Judging by the artist this comes from, it's perfectly safe.
View Details
tuxedo_cat 6/13/2015 7:18:12 PM Rating: 0

I always love to see great lighting and water effects like this. The quality is all-around beautiful. Looking at the artist's works posted in the link, I'd have to say this is probably his/her best.
View Details
tuxedo_cat 6/12/2015 3:31:39 AM Rating: 0

Ew. That's kind of a creepy notion to specifically ask people to write detailed scenarios. I wasn't making any such request. And yes, I did notice GTSWriter's comment earlier. I thought it was a fine, perfectly legitimate case. But you have to admit that this discussion started because someone asked how it was GTS content. Meaning it's not really a strong POV.
View Details
tuxedo_cat 6/12/2015 3:13:50 AM Rating: 0

My comparison was about the interpretation of art. If artwork A can be interpreted as something in a particular context (gt/gts content in this case), then why can't artwork B be interpreted in the same type of context? Not if artwork A is interpreted like this in it's own context, then why can't artwork B be interpreted in a separate context. I wasn't saying that any picture of a person could and should be interpreted as gt/gts content. I was saying that calling a work like this POV, despite having little to interpret it that way, makes about as much sense. Yes, you can say there's a small person in this woman's skirt. But then I'll ask you things like this: How tall is he/she? Is she aware of him/her? Is she doing anything to him, intentionally or otherwise? Would this change in any way if you said the person down there was regular sized? If you don't have an answer, or the answer is no to all of these, then why even bother considering it POV? I saw the Tgirl pics MarkM posted recently. I have to thank you for that Mark. They were quite nice, and they did make a good point in favor of POV, that I completely agree with. In all of them, the woman of focus is looking down at the viewer. Boom! There's now an interaction, and if you change the context of the person below being small or normal sized, it changes completely. With works like this one here, if you were normal sized, you'd still be looking directly at a lovely womanhood, up a skirt. And if you were tiny... you'd get the same thing. With the Tgirl pics though, if you were small, she's aware of you, and you can fill in the blanks for yourself where things went afterwards. But if you were of regular size, then the encounter would be different. The two of you would interact in ways impossible for a tiny person, and vice versa. I guess you could say that you could make a story for this piece, where it would go afterwards. But there's a lot of questions that you have to choose for yourself. Is the woman whose skirt you're up/under aware of you? You don't know. Is she doing anything with the area of focus? No. POV works like those work, because you don't really have to ask how they're a point of view.
View Details
tuxedo_cat 6/12/2015 12:44:29 AM Rating: 0

Just a response to make things clear about my earlier statement... A. I never said I was the authority on determining criteria. That belongs to the artists who made these types of photos or art works, as well as the guidelines on this site, stated clearly at the top of the upload page. What I was meaning was that this type of debate or complaint, depending on the post, stems from the fact that the works are being questioned as to whether or not they are gt/gts content. My answer to the question (not saying my answer was definitive truth) was to look to the source/artist; as that is generally a clear way to tell. B. The Mona Lisa case was a poor, off the top of my head example to counter people who say they interpret pictures like this as point of views. And it ties back to what I was saying about looking up the sources or artists. If the artist didn't make a piece with macro/microphilia in mind, then saying it's POV is purely imaginative. Yes, everyone has the right to interpret art in their own way. But I used something like the Mona Lisa to say that if calling an up-skirt shot POV is valid, then why isn't something like "interpreting" a picture of a woman as gts content just as valid. Again, it was just an off the top of my head point, and not a very strong one. And C. It doesn't really bother me. The site does clearly state that it allows POV's. I was just saying that if this piece wasn't made as one, then it's kind of just shoeing itself into the site.
View Details