Menu
Popular Tags
Comments
luigi 2/3/2011 12:55:28 AM Rating: 0

I agree with Tinyman
View Details
Oktober 2/3/2011 12:51:47 AM Rating: 0

I couldn't locate a source for this image, but I see you had more for this series, are these ones you were missing?
View Details
Oktober 2/3/2011 12:47:52 AM Rating: 0

Actually I can see now what you are saying about the links. I had to log out, and then saw that someone has moved to deletion, so they're not appearing in the gallery. If this one was deleted, this conversation would go with it so it makes sense why it was skipped over.

Anyway, apologies for the confusion, and thanks for bringing that to my attention Sadgringown, I'd have missed it completely! >.<;

Haha, that means Cobra007 is entirely right, this image no longer holds relevance XD
View Details
Oktober 2/3/2011 12:28:46 AM Rating: 0

True, nothing wrong with identifying an image like this. There's actually quite a few that we've found that had nothing to do with giantess so your intent is definitely helpful.

As for the links you have to copy and paste them into your browser. I'm not sure how to make click-able links here, or if the board is even set up for that. (I only know html tags and haven't tried them)
View Details
Sadgringown 2/2/2011 11:36:17 PM Rating: 0

Don't feel embarrassed, you had your heart in the right place. Things that aren't related to size shouldn't be in this gallery unless they're part of a set as is the case here.

Also, those two links above didn't work for me, Oktober.
View Details
Zen 2/2/2011 9:10:49 PM Rating: 0

WOW, Love this one. Good job!
View Details
Zen 2/2/2011 9:09:34 PM Rating: 0

WOW, i love blue tights.. ^_^ I guess i had a thing for smurfette =P
View Details
Cobra007 2/2/2011 7:33:27 PM Rating: 0

Oh... thanks. Now I feel embarrassed :S
View Details
Oktober 2/2/2011 6:41:40 PM Rating: 0

Agreed, but unfortunately it's either one or the other. Bring her foot into focus while she goes out of focus, or bring her into focus while her foot goes out of focus. It's the same as eyesight, but I wish at least with photos you could get the best of both worlds. Everything in focus regardless of distance, this would be awesome.
View Details
stsl74 2/2/2011 6:04:33 PM Rating: 0

CAN BE BETTER.
View Details
Oktober 2/2/2011 5:52:55 PM Rating: 0

This artwork is fantastic! I am totally into this, what a depiction of a Goddess! ^_^ Does anyone recognize who could be the artist? It reminds me a lot of works I've seen from Jonathon Earl Bowser. But I don't think this is him.
View Details
luigi 2/2/2011 3:46:42 PM Rating: 0

gorgeous girl. stunning legs :O
View Details
Oktober 2/2/2011 12:40:29 PM Rating: 0

Really what it comes down to for both poser and collages is if the work looks dated, as in not up with today's abilities, it's likely not going make the cut. It's the same process for everyone regardless of their status here. I think really what we look for in concerning 3D images, is if the image has been produced as an art piece by itself. That means it's not part of a massive set where the artist barely clicked and dragged the image to make it "different" from the last image. Drawing sets are not even done this way, they're advanced scenes to quickly progress the story, a million images with barely minor changes does not make an interesting story, and we won't add a billion frame story to the site.
Out of those sets however we will find exceptional images and be more than happy to add these into the collective as individual art pieces because the scene looks good all on it's own.
As it is with 3D guidelines, free or cheap programs probably would take quite the exceptionally gifted artist to produce images in the clarity we like to see.

We don't pick on 3D artists, they are just unfortunately the larger part of the pie in the screening process, however collages are nearly as tightly screened as 3D works for what we are looking for. A lot of images from the old archive had made it through screening in the mad rush to get the site online, and I think that creates a lot of confusion as to what we are looking for in this site being something like a giantess image museum rather than a place to dump any and all giantess'ish related images.
Slowly we are moving through the image database and refining the images from the old archive that doesn't quite meet the standards we are seeking, hopefully you will be able to tell the difference in overall quality within the database as time progresses.
View Details
Iheartgiantess12 2/2/2011 11:10:32 AM Rating: 0

Where did you get this? Source please.
View Details
Carg 2/2/2011 7:40:28 AM Rating: 0

I was going write a long and polite reply, but fuck it. It's not worth bothering.

Stuff that is easily produced by masses looks horrible. Whether it's drawings, collages, or 3D. Just because a lot of people produce shitty 3D you condemn the entire media? ...don't answer that.
View Details
TinyMan 2/2/2011 7:33:42 AM Rating: 0

Beautiful ads and TV commercial. Fantastic.
View Details
Carg 2/2/2011 7:18:00 AM Rating: 0

This looks like joebu37's work. http://giantesscity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=68882
View Details
BavarianSoul 2/2/2011 6:21:27 AM Rating: 0

Sorry, accidentally warned this picture when I wanted to push the favourite-button. So just ignore.
View Details
Goliath 2/1/2011 10:38:58 PM Rating: 0

Yeah that's the title and it is from Caramel-dow.
Big thanks for uploading this Cobra007! I have been looking for this one for 6 months.
View Details
Oktober 2/1/2011 8:23:17 PM Rating: 0

It's part of a small set. Here's some of the continuation: http://giantessbooru.com/post/view/43220 http://giantessbooru.com/post/view/43219
View Details
2050100
2,841 pages56,817 records