User Comments Curious123

Search Curious123's Comments
Search for keywords or phrases within Curious123's comments.
Curious123 2013-07-05 21:27 Rating: 0

Ignore that, nevermind. Was giving me the same error that corrupted ones usually do, but now it works.
View Details
Curious123 2013-07-05 21:27 Rating: 0

Broken image.
View Details
Curious123 2013-07-05 19:49 Rating: 0

I now think it's the low quality thing. I'll link to the image, so the comments can be seen- http://giantessbooru.com/post/view/160812
View Details
Curious123 2013-07-05 19:47 Rating: 0

(For mods only. Ignore this comment otherwise) I just posted three comments on an image tagged as "Low Quality." While the comments are still there if I click on the image, I noticed they are not on the comment tab. Is this due to it being tagged "low", or is there a new comment system in place? Or is it simply a glitch?
View Details
Curious123 2013-07-05 19:33 Rating: 0

(cont3.) Just so everyone knows, I'm not complaining. Just sharing my opinions and questions about the new flags. I'd really appreciate seeing some other opinions on this. (I split my comment into three parts, so it would be less of a wall of text.)
View Details
Curious123 2013-07-05 19:31 Rating: 0

(cont.) If this is "low" quality, but yet higher quality than some of the stuff already on the site, I think it's clear that some general guidelines for determining the actual quality would be needed. Something else I think is important to note is all the images already on the site. Unless I'm missing something, there's no way for normal users to change flags. I agree with this, but is it reasonable for the mods to go through every single image to determine it's quality, on top of the fact that each mod certainly has a slightly different view of that anyway?
View Details
Curious123 2013-07-05 19:27 Rating: 0

Commenting here, for lack of a better place- While I really do agree with allowing all content, and restricting some of it with a tag, I can't help but feel that it will be impossible to manage. Obviously, all of us have different opinions of what "low" quality is, and what "medium/high" quality is. Take this image for example- it's tagged as low quality. And my opinion completely aside, it probably would have made it to the site without the new 'rule'. Again, I agree with the idea, but with different opinions for everyone, I see no way to effectively manage the different flags.
View Details
Curious123 2013-06-14 18:30 Rating: 0

I, personally, don't feel this meets the quality standard for the site. It would be ok if he were a bit more 'in' her mouth, as opposed to clipping through the side of her face. Nothing against the concept, it's just executed poorly.
View Details
2050100
1 pages8 records