Menu
Popular Tags
User Comments GoddessViolet

GoddessViolet 3/10/2016 11:56:58 AM Rating: 0

I don't buy it. Look at the artifacting and noise in this render. And the picture just before this one has an AmGiPi watermark. I'm not convinced BigMobe is the actual author here...
View Details
GoddessViolet 2/20/2016 2:56:38 PM Rating: 2

Giants and awful puns. It's like everything good and pure in this world all wrapped up in one perfect package.
View Details
GoddessViolet 1/26/2016 4:30:01 AM Rating: 0

Ohhh. I actually see it now. Wow. That's actually pretty subtle.
View Details
GoddessViolet 1/24/2016 11:33:22 PM Rating: 0

There's supposedly a second version of this somewhere. I haven't found it myself, but June herself says that it exists, so it must be true. She complained about the DeviantArt censors, so it must be even hotter than this one, obviously!
View Details
GoddessViolet 1/11/2016 9:40:51 PM Rating: 2

Medium quality: Scene has pretty good set composition, but is still HELLA noisy. (In a render, Noise is when figures and assets look all pixely, the way old-school JPEGs got kinda aritfact-y and fuzzy. It's the result of the computer not running enough cycles of the render before saving it, done usually because the computer has poor specs and/or the author didn't change the right number.)
View Details
GoddessViolet 12/29/2015 9:14:36 AM Rating: 0

Hehe. I was wondering when this would show up! The full project should show up here in a few days or so, and I'm excited to share it with you all!
View Details
GoddessViolet 8/27/2015 11:59:04 PM Rating: 0

Damn, son. These are fabulous~ This beauty will surely inspire a story or two from me... I would love to spin a unique character from her, maybe with your collaboration? Mmm mmm mmm~ <3
View Details
GoddessViolet 7/28/2015 1:30:36 AM Rating: 0

This actually brings up a good point. "Images" in this style always kinda bug me. The style I mean is, taking a collage like this and simply imposing a little text blurb over it like that. I can't put my finger on why, but the juxtaposition creates an incredibly lazy feel, like the creator started with the story (which in my experience, is usually not well-written) and then superimposed it on top of a fairly generic collage made of one part stock giantess and one part stock micro. I've seen collages of similar quality, only they used text bubbles instead of raw text, and for some reason those ones just seem overall... better. Like, somehow using text bubbles instead of block text makes it seem like the speech is closely related to the image content, instead of the image being an afterthought. The whole thing just feels integrated, as if it were one singular piece of art instead of two (or three, in the case of exceptionally poor quality) separate pieces simply glued together. Maybe I'm thinking too hard?
View Details
GoddessViolet 7/28/2015 1:24:19 AM Rating: 4

Whoever DID delete the comment, kudos to you. Regarding your initial comment, and keeping in mind I never actually saw the offending remark (moderators also can't view deleted comments), the correct thing to do when you see an offensive image, is to just move on. I've long believed that a more comprehensive filtration system needs to be implemented, and given the male/furry/quality toggles that already exist, a framework to link the filtration to arbitrarily defined tags should be trivial. It just requires someone with the proper authority to actually DO it. I will say, though, that your secondary comment was utterly inexcusable. Adding "no offense" to an offensive comment does not, in fact, render it inoffensive. It actually does the opposite, and makes it more directly inflammatory. It shows that you know it is an offensive statement, and that you don't care. And regardless of how seriously you intended it, it's not cool to insinuate that people are policing your presence with surgically precise and malicious intent. I guarantee you that nobody here has that kind of time, and anybody who would bother using their power that way wouldn't keep it for very long. tl;dr Don't be That Guy.
View Details
GoddessViolet 4/29/2015 12:00:50 AM Rating: 2

Mmmf. Not NEARLY enough dark elves around, and from Ochiko no less... <3
View Details
GoddessViolet 3/26/2015 12:01:55 AM Rating: 0

Wow. It took a couple glances to figure out what that was in the second to last panel... That's an egg she cummed out. ILU Modeseven. Uh. I'm not sure how to tag that, though...
View Details
GoddessViolet 3/7/2015 7:20:10 PM Rating: 0

ModeSeven is still doing stuff? Wow. That's pretty cool to hear. I love his work~
View Details
GoddessViolet 2/1/2015 3:48:22 PM Rating: 2

@docwholigan It isn't, actually. Someone thought they were being clever and applied that tag to any image of my OC. I fixed it.
View Details
GoddessViolet 2/1/2015 2:56:54 AM Rating: 0

I swore I uploaded this one myself. Did I upload this one? I didn't upload this one. Sourced!
View Details
GoddessViolet 1/30/2015 12:39:58 PM Rating: 0

I'd always thought "Worshippers" was correct, because it follows the general pattern for adding suffixes to words ending in consonant-vowel-consonant. But Firefox INSISTS that it's incorrect. Silly spellchecker I guess? also PRAISE NYMMAZ AND HIS AMAZING ARTS or something like that
View Details
GoddessViolet 12/3/2014 4:06:04 PM Rating: 2

I love the premise here, but I just can't get over the weird anatomy here. It looks like M.C. Escher decided to try his hand at size porn--check out the disappearing cock. The tip is clearly discernible, but as you go down any further, it just looks like there never was a penis, and you're just looking at her leg.
View Details
GoddessViolet 9/26/2014 11:38:24 PM Rating: 2

Nnff~ So hawt! If you ask me, we need way more sexy finger stuff like this. Mrrr.... <3
View Details
GoddessViolet 9/23/2014 5:24:25 AM Rating: 2

I feel like the proper thing to do is to strip out the "male" and "furry" filters entirely, and replace them with a system that lets each individual user filter based on specific tags. Voila. Problem solved for everybody. Yeah, it's a bit more effort to code, but I feel like, since the content filter already exists, extending the framework to accept a list instead of a boolean as an argument shouldn't be a massive undertaking.
View Details
GoddessViolet 9/15/2014 6:03:00 AM Rating: 0

I know for a fact I've seen this on here... Not sure where, or if the old one got deleted or whatever.
View Details
GoddessViolet 7/11/2014 8:34:50 PM Rating: 0

Ahah, so it WAS Dereith~ I wasn't sure because of the collager slapping their logo on the top. Yeah... She's hot, and she's also a super sweetheart~
View Details
2050100
4 pages64 records